False: Only Written Agreements Are Enforceable as Contracts by Courts

Many people believe that only written agreements are enforceable as contracts by courts. However, this is not entirely true.

While it is recommended to have a written contract for legal purposes, verbal agreements can also be considered legally binding contracts. The key factor in determining whether an agreement is legally enforceable is the presence of all essential elements of a contract, regardless of whether it is written or verbal.

The essential elements of a contract include offer, acceptance, consideration, competency of parties, and legality of subject matter. As long as these elements are present, a contract can be formed regardless of whether it is written or verbal.

However, it is important to note that written contracts have advantages over verbal contracts. Written contracts provide evidence of the agreement and can serve as a reference when disputes arise. They also provide details about the parties involved, the terms, and conditions of the agreement.

In contrast, verbal contracts are harder to prove in court as there is no tangible evidence of the agreement. This is why it is often recommended to have written contracts, especially for business agreements.

In conclusion, it is a myth that only written agreements are enforceable as contracts by courts. Both written and verbal contracts can be legally binding as long as they contain all necessary elements of a contract. However, having a written contract provides more benefits and security, especially in the long run.